May 05, 1652 5:00 am: You felt a surge through your solid oak axe as if you were more proficient during your duel with Morghain [77% to 78%]
[ICNRP (in character, non RP)] Skill-building duels
Moderator: Community Team
Re: [ICNRP (in character, non RP)] Skill-building duels
Good fighting Morghain, will get you next time.
Re: [ICNRP (in character, non RP)] Skill-building duels
Minerva cheers for the fighters in the arena.
Re: [ICNRP (in character, non RP)] Skill-building duels
Up for the come back fight Morghain? Same rules like last time.
Re: [ICNRP (in character, non RP)] Skill-building duels
sure, i'll hit you up at reset so we can do it at some point over the day.
Re: [ICNRP (in character, non RP)] Skill-building duels
nearly got sword at 75% maybe next week ill need to duel lets get ready to rubble :pillow:
Thanks for the signature and in memory of its creator Chelle (RIP)
Re: [ICNRP (in character, non RP)] Skill-building duels
Begood to see you, vulkan. Good luck!
@Taz: Mine again!
@Taz: Mine again!
Re: [ICNRP (in character, non RP)] Skill-building duels
You are clearly superior to me
But not a total loss.
But not a total loss.
May 13, 1652 5:00 am: You felt a surge through your solid oak axe as if you were more proficient during your duel with Morghain [80% to 81%]
May 13, 1652 5:00 am: You felt a surge through your solid oak axe as if you were more proficient during your duel with Morghain [79% to 80%]
May 13, 1652 5:00 am: You felt a surge through your solid oak axe as if you were more proficient during your duel with Morghain [78% to 79%]
May 13, 1652 5:00 am: You felt a surge through your solid oak axe as if you were more proficient during your duel with Morghain [79% to 80%]
May 13, 1652 5:00 am: You felt a surge through your solid oak axe as if you were more proficient during your duel with Morghain [78% to 79%]
Re: [ICNRP (in character, non RP)] Skill-building duels
Hehe apparently im a pretty good teacher?
Re: [ICNRP (in character, non RP)] Skill-building duels
Well yes.....? It taught you effectively though didnt it?